
“I loved KISS. Now they want my money – just because I want to honor them. That hurts.”
For decades, tribute bands have been an essential part of rock culture – a passionate homage, a way to keep the fire burning. But now KISS has taken a controversial step: if you want to paint your face, dress up like them, and call yourself a KISS tribute band, you’ll need a license. And yes – you’ll have to pay.
What happened to the love between the band and the fans?
This is the story of how childhood heroes turned into legal entities – and why it feels like betrayal.
A Lifelong Relationship – Until the Business Took Over
I remember the first time I saw Gene Simmons breathe fire and spit blood on TV. I was 13. It was as if gods had descended from the sky.
KISS wasn’t just a band – it was a universe.
Many of us painted our faces, cut up clothes, and started garage bands with distorted guitars and glittery dreams. Not for fame. Not for money. But because… it was KISS.
So when I read Paul Stanley's recent interview, stating that tribute bands now need licenses – and that those licenses can be revoked – it hit hard.
It’s not about borrowing a song. It’s about no longer being allowed to celebrate what shaped your youth – unless you pay for it.
What Paul Stanley Actually Said
In the podcast Howie Mandel Does Stuff, Stanley explained how KISS now handles tribute bands:
“There are some KISS tributes that we’ve allowed to continue. It’s a matter of giving them the license to do it – that can be revoked at any time, because all the makeups, all those personas are trademarked and nobody can use those for any purpose.”
In short: the makeup, the characters, the costumes – all of it is trademarked. And using them without permission is an infringement.
Then came the real sting:
“Yes, it’s okay to make some money – but your heart has to be in the right place.”
Translation? It’s not enough to love KISS – you need to love them their way. And if they decide you don’t, you’re out.
Tribute Bands: The Unsung Heroes
Tribute bands are part of rock’s DNA. Think of Strutter in the U.S. or KISStory in Europe – acts that have performed for decades, bringing joy to thousands of fans longing to relive the magic.
They’re built on passion, attention to detail, and love.
But now their work is rebranded as theft. Not tribute – trespassing.
Where does that leave us? If homage now requires contracts, fees, approvals, and control – the spark may die before the amps even turn on.
The Legal Side of Face Paint
KISS has spent decades building their brand. Logos, personas, makeup, stage shows – all protected. That’s understandable.
But here’s the rub: these protections are now being used against fans.
The same people who bought the albums, the posters, the concert tickets – are now being asked to pay again, just to celebrate the band they adore.
While music licensing (like STIM or ASCAP) covers the songs, the characters – The Demon, The Starchild, The Catman, and The Spaceman – are legally protected intellectual property. And that’s the problem.
You can play “Detroit Rock City” – but don’t dress like Gene Simmons.
Tribute Becomes Trademark
This is more than a personal reaction. It’s a shift in the industry.
Tribute bands have become big business – from local bar gigs to global tours like The Australian Pink Floyd Show or ABBA The Show.
And where there’s money, there’s control. KISS knows the value of their brand. But where do we draw the line?
Should karaoke singers pay royalties too?
When Fans Become Frauds
What used to be “You wanted the best – you got the best!”
now feels more like:
“You wanted to honor us? Pay up first.”
It’s as if KISS forgot where they came from. This band was made by the fans. They exploded because we bought the shirts, the pins, the bootlegs – and started our own bands in their honor.
And now, as we grow older and still want to relive the magic – here come the lawyers.
KISS Inc. – More Company Than Band
KISS isn’t just a rock band anymore. It’s a corporation.
Stanley and Simmons have always been shrewd businessmen.
They’ve sold lunchboxes, comic books, coffins (!), cologne, jewelry – and now: licenses to pretend to be them.
This isn’t a whim. It’s a post-tour business strategy.
As KISS finishes their final tour, they want to monetize the legacy by licensing others to carry it forward – at a price.
But is that really rock’n’roll?
So What Happens Now?
If you run a tribute band and want to wear KISS makeup, costumes, and use their look:
-
You must apply for an official license.
-
Approval depends on “your heart being in the right place.”
-
You’ll likely pay fees to use characters and designs.
-
The license can be revoked at any time.
What do you get in return?
The right to keep doing what you already love – just with added paperwork and a price tag.
The Price of Passion
We live in a world where culture has become intellectual property.
You can’t even dress like your heroes anymore without someone sending you a cease-and-desist.
And KISS isn’t alone. Disney, Marvel, and others are already here.
But when ownership trumps love – we lose something deeper.
Music should be free.
Tribute should be welcomed – not taxed.
Final Thoughts – From Fan to Free Spirit
I may never start a KISS tribute band. But I know what it feels like to want to.
To put on the boots, the makeup, scream “I Was Made for Lovin’ You” and pretend, just for a moment, that you’re part of the world’s greatest band.
And it hurts to know that now… you need permission.
Being a fan is no longer enough. You need to be a licensee.
But you know what?
Rock’n’roll was never about asking permission. It was born from rebellion – from sticking it to the system.
Maybe the true heirs of KISS will be the ones who still paint their faces, plug in their guitars, and do it anyway – not for money, but for love.

By Chris...
Disclaimer:
This post is an editorial and artistic reflection expressing personal opinions regarding recent statements made by members of the band KISS. All trademarks, logos, and character designs mentioned or referenced – including but not limited to the name KISS, the logo, and stage personas – are registered trademarks owned by their respective holders. No part of this content is intended to infringe upon, exploit, or violate these rights. The graphic image is an independent artistic interpretation with no commercial intent, created solely to illustrate the theme of the article.
Add comment
Comments