Being Seen Through Other People’s Eyes – and Disappearing as a Human Being

Published on 27 December 2025 at 11:41

“You saw me and who I was through what others said — not who I truly was.”

This sentence carries more than personal disappointment. It reveals a structural flaw in how people relate to one another. A flaw that emerges when presence is replaced by narratives, when judgment is outsourced, and when human complexity is reduced to second-hand information.

To be seen through other people’s eyes is to be diminished. Not always out of malice, but often out of convenience, fear — and sometimes calculation.

The Missing Gaze

To truly see someone is not a passive act. It requires attention, time, and a certain degree of courage. When we meet a person without filters or preconceptions, we risk being affected — perhaps even challenged. It is far easier to rely on what others have already said. Their words become a map, even when the map is crude or completely wrong.

The moment someone chooses to see you through others’ descriptions, they have already decided who you are. The encounter no longer takes place between two human beings, but between a human being and a story.

And stories have a peculiar quality: they often outlive the truth.

The Second-Hand Human

When you are reduced to what others have said about you, your actions become secondary. Your words are filtered. Your intentions are questioned or misread. You become a second-hand human — someone people believe they know without ever having met.

This often happens in environments where speed, hierarchy, and position matter more than understanding: workplaces, social systems, organizations — sometimes even close relationships. In these spaces, judgments travel faster than insight. Rumors gain more weight than lived experience.

The paradox is that this behavior often thrives in environments that claim to value professionalism, empathy, or openness.

Speaking Ill of Others to Elevate Oneself

Here we encounter a critical mechanism:

Speaking badly about others in order to appear better oneself.

This rarely happens loudly or openly. More often, it is subtle:

  • through insinuations

  • through half-truths

  • through “just sharing a concern”

  • through questioning motives rather than actions

Those who speak ill of others rarely do so in service of truth. It is about relational repositioning — lowering someone else to rise slightly higher in the room.

It is an ancient social tactic:
If I define you, I avoid being defined myself.

Power in Everyday Language

In professional environments, this tactic is particularly common. Instead of demonstrating competence through one’s own work, some people use others’ supposed shortcomings as contrast.

“He’s difficult.”
“She often creates conflict.”
“There’s something that doesn’t quite work there.”

The words are vague. Evidence is absent. But the effect is clear.

The listener receives a ready-made image.
The person spoken about is given no chance to respond.
And the speaker appears — by comparison — safer, smoother, more acceptable.

This is not strength.
It is positioning through dismantling.

Why This Strategy Works

Speaking ill of others works because it exploits human weaknesses:

  • fear of exclusion

  • need for belonging

  • avoidance of conflict

  • lack of time and presence

The listener rarely thinks, “I should form my own opinion.”
More often, they think, “Good to know.”

And so the story travels on — often without ill intent, but with full impact.

Projection — When the Other Becomes a Mirror

More often than not, those who speak badly about others reveal more about themselves than about the person they describe.

The insecure project.
The fearful suspect.
The powerless create narratives.

People with integrity, experience, or the ability to see through systems often become targets — not because they are wrong, but because they disrupt balance.

Talking them down becomes a way to regain control.

When Experience Becomes a Threat

People with deep experience carry knowledge that cannot always be packaged into trendy terms or simplified models. They have seen patterns repeat. They understand how decisions land in reality.

This can be uncomfortable for those still building identity on ambition rather than grounding.

Instead of listening, one may choose to:

  • question personality

  • doubt intentions

  • label the person as “a problem”

It is easier than admitting someone else sees more clearly.

Career Logic Replacing Judgment

Within jobs and careers, this behavior is especially destructive. Here, we often base our attitudes toward others on what third parties say, and in doing so risk decisions with long-term consequences.

Recruitments, promotions, project roles, and informal power positions are not always shaped by competence and experience, but by narratives. Who is seen as “easy to work with.” Who is considered “problematic.” Who “creates friction.”

And rarely do we ask the decisive question:
For whom does this person create friction — and why?

Losing the Key Person

This is where organizations lose their greatest asset.

Key people are rarely the most adaptable.
They are often the ones who:

  • detect system failures early

  • dare to question

  • carry experience that doesn’t fit templates

  • understand consequences beyond the next quarter

Precisely for these reasons, they become vulnerable.

Instead of listening, people start talking about them.
Instead of dialogue, interpretation begins.
Instead of using their strength, the system neutralizes it.

The organization believes it is protecting itself.
In reality, it is amputating its own intelligence.

Comfort Over Capability

There is a dangerous preference in many career environments: comfort over competence.

Those who don’t challenge feel safe.
Those who don’t question seem cooperative.
Those who don’t disrupt become “a good cultural fit.”

But innovation, resilience, and long-term health often require the opposite.

When we let others’ negative stories shape our view of a person, we often discard:

  • friction that leads to improvement

  • experience that exposes flaws

  • perspectives that could have saved projects

The Quiet Grief

Being seen wrongly — and understanding why — creates a specific kind of grief. Not because one loses value, but because one realizes the meeting was never possible.

The relationship was built on hearsay rather than presence.
On strategy rather than curiosity.

But the greatest loss is not yours.

Those who chose gossip over meeting you lost:

  • a real conversation

  • deeper understanding

  • human complexity

Reclaiming One’s Narrative

There comes a point when one stops trying to correct others’ stories. Not from resignation, but from clarity.

One realizes:
Those who want to see, will see.
Those who want to position themselves, will speak.

Standing firm in who you are — without playing the same game — is not passivity. It is integrity.

You do not need to speak ill of others to be whole.
You do not need to lower anyone to stand steady yourself.

Clarity, Not Bitterness

Understanding this pattern does not lead to bitterness — but to calm. You begin to distinguish between people who build relationships and those who build positions.

You learn to listen carefully to how people speak about others.
Because that is always where they reveal themselves.

Closing Reflection

To truly see a human being requires courage.
To speak ill of others requires only an audience.

Not everyone chooses the harder path.
But those who have once been truly seen will never again accept being reduced to others’ words — or participate in a game where human value becomes currency.

That is not arrogance.
That is dignity.

 

By Chris...


Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.